Skip to main content

EOYS 2013 & GSAPP Graduation

Last year I had the luxury of visiting the annual GSAPP End of Year Show (EOYS) after the opening night, so I could spend some time looking at the projects and thinking about how they represented the work of the school.  This year, with graduation and moving directly after the opening, I didn't have that opportunity, but I have a few images of the set-up and projects from opening night and the previous day.



My own studio decided to go for a minimalist approach, painting our area dark grey and hanging seven identical screens, one for each project.  We built out a shelf for models, painted the inside neon green, and installed an LED strip to illuminate the models on the shelf.  I helped install the screens, which took much more time than it should have!  I think it looked pretty classy.  Our location was in a short hallway leading to the cafe, which was great for getting lots of people to see it as they went by, but terrible for people who wanted to spend any time looking at the projects.  Anyone lingering in the hallway nearly got run over.  But at least it looked ok as one walked quickly past.



My favorite projects are always the outdoor pavilions from the Fast Pace / Slow Space class.  These large-scale works are the result of a semester-long team effort, something I didn't feel that I had time to do in my final semester at GSAPP.  They're all the more impressive when you realize that most of the students building these are third-years, who are trying to finish their graduation requirements and portfolios at the same time.  The mini-forest of PVC pipe and plastic bags, called Sway, was the most compelling for me.  The project created a sense of anticipation inside, since the narrow pathway obscured views both in front of and behind you, leading to unexpected encounters.  And it had a nice bench for photos in front!  Unfortunately, TINA, the wooden tensegrity piece, didn't survive the rain after the EOYS, reminding us all not to forget our vapor barriers.   The third piece had an undulating roof of reflective material that moved with the breeze, and would probably be great for parties.

TINA*

Sway

Sway

Not sure of the name - comment if you remember!

The other studio projects I enjoyed were some of the first year studios, Bob Marino's studio, C-BIP studio, and the furniture classes' exhibition.  The first year studios are generally the most elaborate, since they are finished the earliest with their final reviews and have the most time to prepare.  Bob's studio had lovely wooden models, similar to last year.  C-BIP studio appeared to have finally succumbed to complete insanity, with a dinner table setup explaining the studio through bizarre food-related metaphors, including a real, whole fish.




Bob Marino's studio

C-BIP Studio

The furniture class exhibition looked great, as should be expected from a display built by the instructor himself.  I managed to get one of my seating units into the show!  I also had a wall system on display as part of the Beyond Prototype class.

Craft in the Digital Age - my "seating unit" at center


"Structural Storage," with Amir Afifi, Sepideh Khazaei, and Miguel Lantigua

Overall I enjoyed this year's EOYS, but perhaps it was just my deliriousness at being finished with school, coupled with a bad cold that I caught as soon as I finished all my work.  There weren't as many patently ridiculous first-year displays as the year before (I still remember the giant picture frame and "double agent architect" stuff from last year, although the latter made a reappearance).  I wish that the third-year/AAD work could have been grouped together, since scattering it around Avery Hall made it difficult to compare the work from one studio to another, but perhaps eventually Buell Hall will be renovated enough to use it for the EOYS again.  Not having that extra space, which we did have last year and the year before, made it difficult to accommodate all the studios.  The second-years were all together on the 4th floor, and the first-years were all in Brownie's, but the rest of the studios were seemingly put into any other available space.  Even granting that the first-years "put on a better show" than the third-years, because of their copious free time and effort, it seems unfair to relegate the final projects of three years of work to a cramped hallway (like we had) or to a tiny classroom on the fifth floor.  Hopefully next year will be better.

Graduation

There's not much to say except congratulations, everyone!  Let's go make better buildings!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Voter's Guide: Local Elections 2016

I spent a long time researching different local races and some of the ballot measures here in Santa Clara County.  In case you're on the fence or want some further information to guide your voting, I've compiled my thoughts here. Selection Methodology I have three tiers for selecting  candidates. 1. Alignment on Issues:  I will choose the candidate who is most closely aligned with me on the issues I think are important. 2. Experience and Education:  All other things being equal, I will choose the candidate who has the most knowledge of what is required for the position, either through education, previous experience, or active participation in similar positions. 3. Women and Minorities:  All other things being equal (#1 and #2 above), I will choose candidates who are women or minorities in order to increase the diversity of voices of our elected officials.  It's my own personal form of affirmative action. The Issues We're fortunate enough to live in a place

Housing Affordability in the Bay Area: An Architectural Perspective

The Bay Area's housing crisis has gained a status akin to the weather: We can't help but mention it whenever two or more Bay Area residents are gathered together, and we feel there's equally nothing we can do to change it.  But instead of the general praise given to the area's weather, there is general despair about the state of housing.  At least among the twenty-something set and construction industry professionals who make up my peers and colleagues, there are few answers and much criticism for the way we live here.  It's not dense enough, public transportation is a sham, and housing costs are outrageous.  Many of my peers agree that they would not live here at all except that their spouse/significant other works in the tech industry, without whose salary they could not afford to live here, but whose worth is so valued here that it makes little sense economically to live elsewhere.  Here in the Peninsula it's just as bad as in San Francisco ("the city&

Book Review: "Theory and Design in the First Machine Age"

Reyner Banham 's Theory and Design in the First Machine Age (1960) is an engaging overview of the important theoretical developments of the early 20th century leading up to the "International Style" of the 1930s-40s.  Banham does a fairly good job, in my opinion, of avoiding excessive editorializing, although he has a clear viewpoint on the Modern Movement and finishes with a strong conclusion.  In opposition to his teacher, Nikolaus Pevsner , whose own history of modernism came out in 1936, Banham dismantled the " form follows function " credo that became the stereotype of modernism, arguing instead that formalism (a preoccupation with style and aesthetics) was an important, if not overriding, concern of Modern architects.  Two sections of the book struck me in particular: his analysis of Le Corbusier's famous book Vers une architecture (Toward a [new] architecture) from 1923, and his Conclusion (chapter 22), where he breaks the link between functionali