Skip to main content

Exhibition Review: "Foreclosed" at MoMA

This Thursday I went with a friend to see the latest architecture exhibition at MoMA, "Foreclosed: Rehousing the American Dream," which is sponsored by the Buell Center (an affiliate of GSAPP).  The exhibition shows five project proposals for re-designing suburbs with high foreclosure rates across the US.  Most of the five firms who contributed also teach at (or are otherwise associated with) GSAPP, so they were familiar groups.  Additionally, last semester was the "housing project" semester for us, so just a few months ago we were working on our own housing designs.   Overall, I was surprised and amused by the similarities between our (student) proposals and these (professional) proposals; many of the ideas and intentions were the same, leading me to wonder if these ideas are architectural "fads" that circulate almost subconsciously here in the city.  See commentary below on each project for more specifics.  You can read about each project in more depth on the "Foreclosed" website - I've linked to each project.

1. MOS with Hilary Sample (GSAPP Housing Studio Coordinator): "Thoughts on a Walking City"
Since Hilary is a GSAPP professor and I've seen this project before (she presented it during the housing studio), I'll pass over it.  Suffice to say that it is more on the radical/speculative end of the spectrum of proposals.


2.  Michael Bell and Visible Weather: "Simultaneous City" in Temple Terrace, FL
Michael Bell is another critic at GSAPP, but not one I've had before.  Although his group's proposal was filled with slick renderings, I was not at all convinced, because it didn't look like anyone on the team had really thought about or looked at Florida's climate.  There was text saying that the project would do this or that regarding climate, but one look at the images was enough to show that it would be ridiculous in Temple Terrace.  All that glass would need to be washed continuously!  Besides that, where is the vegetation in the renderings?  Nothing in Florida looks like the images below - stark white and reflective - because it would blind you, and vegetation takes over whenever it gets a chance.  Maybe it's just the style of the images, but it looks to me like no one on the design team had been to Florida.


3.  Zago Architecture, "Property with Properties"
This is another project that left me feeling unconvinced.   The talk about "misregistration" and flexible boundaries etc. didn't seem to do much to change the overall standard suburban layout of the proposed subdivision.  The models were amazing, although Seussical in their color choices and shapes.



4.   WORKac, "Nature-City"
(Another GSAPP-related firm)  I didn't look at the text for this one as thoroughly as I should have, but I blame this on the craziness of the visual material.  I'm not totally sure what's going on, but it seems pretty cool.  The ensemble of weird shapes makes me think of Koolhaas, specifically of "City of the Captive Globe," while the main site model really begged for having a model train going around it.  I can't say that the project made sense, but it was fun to look at.



5.  Studio Gang, "The Garden in the Machine"
This project most reminded me of the my own housing project, where we too tried to imagine a mixed-use building that would allow families to increase or decrease the amount of space they used as their families grew or shrank.  We ended up designing a kind of factory-like building with the potential to be reconfigured as needed.  Here, Studio Gang proposes literally deconstructing an existing factory to salvage its materials and build a new mixed-use group of buildings.  I liked the image style very much.



I'm not sure what I took away from this exhibition other than the general feeling that we students are generally on the same page as these practitioners, and that I don't know whether that's a good thing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Vertical Bike Rack

The work of our hands!


A little backstory:  We bought two bikes as soon as we could after moving here, so we could both bike to work.  After a few uneventful months of chaining up our bikes next to our car in the carport of our apartment building, Justin's bike was stolen.  (Mine was mysteriously left behind, together with Justin's pannier, which the thieves helpfully folded up and placed on top of my bike.  My only guess is that the chain holding my bike was harder to cut than the chain on Justin's.)  Since then, we've kept our bikes inside, hauling them up and down two flights of stairs to our third-floor apartment every time we take them out, which is usually a few times a week.  Ugh.  Better than buying a new bike every few months, though.

We needed a rack that would keep the bikes off the floor, off the walls, and in as small a footprint as possible, without requiring us to drill into or otherwise damage the walls (or floor or ceiling).  This proved a challenge t…

Book Review: "Theory and Design in the First Machine Age"

Reyner Banham's Theory and Design in the First Machine Age (1960) is an engaging overview of the important theoretical developments of the early 20th century leading up to the "International Style" of the 1930s-40s.  Banham does a fairly good job, in my opinion, of avoiding excessive editorializing, although he has a clear viewpoint on the Modern Movement and finishes with a strong conclusion.  In opposition to his teacher, Nikolaus Pevsner, whose own history of modernism came out in 1936, Banham dismantled the "form follows function" credo that became the stereotype of modernism, arguing instead that formalism (a preoccupation with style and aesthetics) was an important, if not overriding, concern of Modern architects.  Two sections of the book struck me in particular: his analysis of Le Corbusier's famous book Vers une architecture (Toward a [new] architecture) from 1923, and his Conclusion (chapter 22), where he breaks the link between functionalism and …

LEED Green Associate

Today I am pleased to report that I have passed the LEED® Green Associate exam, so I am now officially a LEED-accredited professional.  I have a few thoughts on this process that might be helpful for others looking into getting their own LEED Green Associate credential.  While I'm certainly in support of sustainable building practices, which is why I went to the trouble to get the credential in the first place, I don't think it's inappropriate to take a critical stance toward the whole enterprise in order to challenge the profession (and the industry) to be more self-aware.

The preparation: I passed the exam by using only resources that were freely available to me through my school library, including an e-book version of the LEED Green Associate study guide by Michelle Cottrell and the USGBC LEED Core Concepts Guide.  (Although I asked the library to obtain a new copy of the official USGBC LEED Green Associate Study Guide since the one they had was lost, they still haven&…